I can somewhat understand the logic of coming to 'a new understanding' sometimes. But this is plainly rewriting history.
- Old light: during WWI we didn't preach. This is evidence of being captured by Babylon
- New light: during WWI we preached zealously. This is evidence that we were not captured by Babylon.
So did they preach or not? Is the new evidence made up, or the old evidence?
How is it even possible that they get new information about their own history, especially now that everyone who actually had first hand experience is dead?